|

An Interview with Prof. Ari Sitas,
South African poet, Sociologist and Activist
who visited JNU in
December, 2008
interviewed
by Bhoomika Meiling for JNU News
Bhoomika:
There are several facets to your personality-
sociologist, poet, dramatist, activist, etc. How do you manage to play
all these roles at the same time? Also, tell us about your visit to
JNU.
Prof. Sitas: Increasingly… with a lot of difficulty. I am part
of the lucky generation in South Africa because I could be a serious
full time academic after the transition. At the same time I could also
take part in political activities and policy making of the country as
an activist. I have always been in two worlds: half of me in the
creative fields and half in academic work. Most of the time when one
predominates the other automatically takes a backseat. For instance in
the 80's, I produced more work in sociology. But in the next decade, I
shifted to poetry which is more of individualistic than sociology or
even drama which involves a lot of people. Increasingly my role in
drama has diminished though I write a play every now and then.
Being a sociologist
has helped me in being a better listener and observer which comes
handy while writing poetry or even drama. Things get balanced that
way. But it is true that most of my waking hours are spent in the
university, in scholarship, in administering, in research, etc.
Sociology is my vocation. I write poetry in the night- after hours.
I've been called here as a sociologist but I've been asked by SAA to
speak about drama in South Africa too. And then the activism part is
also so similar and integral to the cultures of both the countries.
People here take interest in my role as an activist too.
Bhoomika: Were
you always a student of sociology?
Prof. Sitas: Yes, I never studied poetry or drama.
Bhoomika: And
now-a-days you are not as much involved in drama as in poetry?
Prof. Sitas: Yes, I have only written two plays in the last eight
years. But my poetry books come out regularly. And I find that at the
end of the day when you are trying to balance the different tasks in
the brain, creativity takes over and it is more poetry than sociology
or anything else that is taking place right now.
Bhoomika: What
are your areas of specialization in Sociology?
Prof. Sitas: At the moment I'm completing the introduction to a
book called The Mandela Decade which is about what happened to the
labour movement in South Africa during the transition; what happened
between the haves and the have-nots and the loopholes that got us
stuck in the transition; what remarkable changes have been caused in
the economy on the one hand and on the other the attempts of the state
to create a more egalitarian society after these nationwide changes.
There are several ongoing processes in South Africa that look at
different aspects and after- effects of that politically and socially
intense period. We are also very much concerned with the livelihood of
the poor in our country. I think these are areas of common interest
for people there and here. I am also working much more theoretically
now. It involves work with other theorists of the global south trying
to understand, and transform the understanding that “modernity” does
not start with the industrial revolution in England. We are trying to
redefine modernity. Theories that have developed in the last two
decades presuppose a lot when they talk of individualism, post
modernism and the post industrial age. All of that makes sense for
Europe but not for us. In India, China, South Africa, it is not like
that- and I refuse to accept that what we are experiencing is in any
sense marginal. We are trying to consolidate such thinking networks.
Bhoomika: We are
going through a period of economic slowdown and recession. What role
do you think can India and South Africa play in times of such global
trouble?
Prof. Sitas: There are three things about both of them that I
would like to point out- firstly, they are both concerned about social
delivery. Secondly, they are concerned with the handling of the
meltdown. Thirdly, it will not be as bad as it is for the west as the
Governments have been more prudent in handling the process of
liberalization. It is going to be a difficult time, no doubt. But I
can see a commitment to working towards more responsible and sensible
forms of state intervention and co-operation. This is certainly not
the last crisis of capitalism and we know that countries like China,
India and South Africa are actually the countries that are providing
the little stability that exists in these times. They are growing and
doing well. They are creating an alternative to the rigid division of
labour seen in the West and Europe. It is like a contemporary counter
culture. Though India and South Africa are very different, the types
of social movements we have witnessed in the last twenty years are
quite similar. A civil society to civil society co-operation is
visible between them. Brazilians, South Africans and Indians are
moving in same direction taking care at the same time of their
individual problems. South Africa has to take care of
industrialization, poverty alleviation, education, co-operation etc.
These are the priorities of India and China too. Since our problems
are similar the approach towards solving them is also similar. It is
an exciting and turbulent time for all of us.
Bhoomika: How
would you describe the relevance of the Gandhian doctrine in the
present global scenario?
Prof. Sitas: Gandhi is a very complex individual and a very
complex legacy. He was an individual with his own idiosyncrasies but
he is looked up upon in India and elsewhere for his actions. He is
very important. His actions primarily related to a doctrine that
affected both India and South Africa for obvious reasons and he was
central to the emergence of South African anti-colonial nationalism.
He influenced very strongly the ideas of pan-Africanism. His ideas and
his focus on praxis influenced many leaders in Africa. The idea that
'the other' is not something that can be used or shot or exterminated
and that the other is not just the colonial master is important and
relevant even today. There are several movements which have been
inspired by Gandhi. But that praxis alone does not constitute Gandhi
totally. It is important to remember that the last century began with
the dominance of the gun, fear, subjugation and anger. But this
century began with a more pacifist worldview. Gandhi was one of the
contributors in bringing this more pacific moment. I stay in Durban
where he spent the earlier days of his long journey. The Phoenix
Settlement is just round the corner. Every year there is a salt march
when people walk for twenty kilometers (it usually rains at that time)
to commemorate the movement that took place there a century ago. So
symbolically too Gandhi is very significant in South Africa. Though he
left the country quite early, his philosophy of practice was born
there. We have that affinity with him. Later a different affinity
developed- the non-aligned ideology. In ways more than one, African
nationalism and Indian nationalism were of a similar hue for many
years.
Bhoomika: Coming
to literature, what role does orality play in your writings?
Prof. Sitas: My engagement with several grass root movements
especially the labour movement, showed that a lot of people involved
in trade unionism towards the beginning were migrant labourers who
brought with themselves a lot of their oral traditions into the
discourse of protest. It influenced me a lot and it showed me the
power of orality. We can not imagine the rise of the major social
movements in South Africa without the work of orality. Its rhetorical
power and legitimacy is beyond questioning. In traditions like Imbongi
poetry the poet has the right to speak and articulate what is
happening around him. The oral traditions are also important due to
the African Christian congregations. We have had many churches which
used the poetic and phonetic elements of the oral very actively. The
oral has been all around and now it has started interacting with the
written word very interestingly. It influences the written word and
then the written word influences it- it is a give and take process.
The schooling system somehow has not used it in a significant way. But
digitality has been good for oral culture- the new media have worked
well to record and even propagate interest in the oral. It has also
helped us to understand that all oral is not one soup that there are
variations in genres and performative forms, everyday variations in
communication etc. If you listen to a Zulu poet from Soveto, and
somebody from the country side, they'll be speaking two different
kinds of language.
Today it has a very
high value in literature. One of the distinctive features of theatre
is that if it is meant for a large popular audience, the oral has to
be ever-present. Not only alternative theatre abut also established
theatre is using it. We are now in the last years of any possible oral
recording because we can only go about six generations back. In the
coastal southern areas of Africa like Mozambique and Tanzania, orality
was the dominant form of communication. It is very significant
therefore for the construction of history itself. To construct an
internal narrative as opposed to the colonial narrative, we need to
preserve and work with these oral accounts. These records have to be
documented. I have been definitely influenced by them in the way I
work with words in poetry. Half of the poems I've written have been
for public reading and I have used a lot from the indigenous oral
tradition. One also needs to critically shake people out of their
comfort zones. And most of our poetry has been discomforting…
Bhoomika: What
are the prominent themes and issues in your poetry?
Prof. Sitas: My first book Tropical Scars that made me famous was
based on the violence in the civil war. It was about the experiences
that constituted Durban. It was immediately seen as good surrealist
poetry. The critics found it surrealist probably because many of them
did not have my kind of encounters I was caught between the university
and the mass struggle and within a lot of “madness”. I was negotiating
between several worlds which were full of contradictions. These poems
were very real to me though they might look surreal to others. 'Ethekwani',
a piece from there is about the peculiarity of the Durban experience.
Next I went for more musical verses. I tried to give a musical quality
to my poems . It was called Songs Shoeshine and Piano. Some of those
poems have been set to music. Then came my seven year long project
called Slave Trades about my encounter with Ethiopia. It is the most
difficult thing I have done and it is set around the turn of the
century- the 20th cent. It is difficult to describe. It draws from the
story the French tell about the poet Rimbaud whose genius crashed in
Ethiopia where he became a gun trader and abandoned poetry. The new
modernism of France was mourning for the hero lost there in Ethiopia.
I am telling the same story from the other side. It is about his
peculiar character. It is a difficult text and much more for reading
than reciting. My next book was called The RDP Poems i.e. the
reconstruction and development programme poems. It is about the
experiences in the transition, of the transition. I have tried to
create a language that is ripped of normal decoration. It is stark,
closer to prose in a sense. It is not the adorned language of poetry.
I'm writing here as
well. Let's see what happens. There are some works forthcoming though
not immediately- a novel, and a volume of my plays (which is going to
be tough to put together). These things would come out eventually.
What is already out apart from the four poetry books is a theoretical
piece called The Ethic of Reconciliation. It is an intervention on the
ongoing debates about an appropriate ethics for our times. In 2004,
another piece called Theoretical Parables came out which was about
theorizing orality.
Bhoomika: Tell
us something about your experience of India and JNU?
Prof. Sitas: This is my fifth visit to India but the first
extended trip. Earlier I saw Mumbai, Pune, Agra and the regular
tourist places in snippets. Mumbai was my first experience here. It
was very intense and interesting. But in my next visit in February,
2009 I would like to see more and do a lot of work. I don't want to do
it as a tourist. I want to speak to people and understand how and what
they think about a lot of things. JNU has been the starting point of
that experience. I have talked to many people about their problems,
aspirations, about this and that- I'm taking copious notes. The
rhythms of daily life are much different from what we are used to. It
amazes me to see people putting enormous efforts into earning close to
nothing. The equation between need and greed seems very different
here. JNU has had very nice people who took time off to acquaint me to
the dos and don'ts, to acclimatize me. There is a v prominent
subculture here which I call the India Prohibitions. They are teaching
me well. One has to know what one is not supposed to do here to avoid
disasters. JNU is beautiful especially the wild life around and the
walks in the mornings. The students were writing their exams when I
arrived so I could not interact much with them. But I hope I will be
able to speak to them in my next visit. JNU is a very interesting
university, so different from our universities. Students and teachers
here have a different orientation and a different culture. Of course,
CSSS has been very good to me. JNIAS has taken good care of me. So I
am beginning to arrive.
|